Talk:Alison Hughes

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Referees Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Referees WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Referees. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.RefereesWikipedia:WikiProject RefereesTemplate:WikiProject RefereesReferees
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Tennis Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tennis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to tennis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TennisWikipedia:WikiProject TennisTemplate:WikiProject Tennistennis

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tennis To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Take an item off the Cleanup listing
Copyedit : Roger Federer, Leander Paes, Rafael Nadal, Justine Henin – to be used as examples for ideal page structures
Expand : Grab a Start article and expand it, or peruse the List of articles.
Photo : Add photos to Tennis or Tennis people articles
Stubs : Bring a Stub up to our standards.
Other : *Sign up as a member of the project.
Tag more articles with our standard project template.
Help with the creation of yearly main articles and drawsheets for every Open Era ATP and WTA tournament.

Women's sport Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Red: 2017

This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project in 2017. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red

This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help!

A fact from Alison Hughes appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 January 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in 2015, Alison Hughes was part of the first ever all-female officiating team in a Fed Cup final?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2017/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alison Hughes.

Wikipedia

Undue

This is not terrible by any stretch, especially when compared to some of the stuff that gets added to to umpire/referee articles, but the single sentence saying that a player disputed a call she made seems little undue. We have an umpire with over 20 years of top level officiating so to mention a single incident in this career (even briefly) seems to violate WP:BALASP. This also lacks some context and any indication that the incident had any lasting effect on her career. AIRcorn (talk) 18:09, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the associated 2015 Wimbledon Championships article and could not find a mention of the incident there. This seems like a better place to put this inforamtion as it can be expanded on without as much fear of becoming WP:undue. AIRcorn (talk)

Fine by me if others agree. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:49, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Joseph2302 and Aircorn: I have just reviewed that article at DYK. I think that Aircorn make a good point and that the sentence should be removed. – Ianblair23 (talk) 12:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removed. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]