Talk:Alicia Eler
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Arguably significant coverage in cited sources, specifically: [1], [2], [3]. ~Kvng (talk) 21:32, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Added 18 incoming links. ~Kvng (talk) 21:44, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Alicia Eler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160316111047/http://gawker.com/the-best-things-we-read-in-2015-1749593281 to http://gawker.com/the-best-things-we-read-in-2015-1749593281
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:57, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia as self-publicity...
[edit]... again. What a surprise.
Her book is a vacuous account of a close-to-vacuous life, that confuses social media with actual living. Sadly, an only-too-common experience of the social media, 'social naive' generation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.175.56.45 (talk) 21:29, 29 May 2019 (UTC)