Talk:Ali Soilih

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Africa: Comoros / Madagascar Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Comoros (assessed as Top-importance).
	Madagascar portal This article is supported by WikiProject Madagascar (assessed as Low-importance).

Socialism

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Citation

the 'How to Stage a Military Coup' book cited for almost the entirety of the Consequences section in no way appears to be a legitimate source. it's a pulpy "true spy stories" book ghost-written on behalf of an old SAS dude. not exactly reputable or informative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:47:4001:CAD0:C1E6:2528:8E1B:62AF (talk) 01:25, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Completely agreed. The way the article is written in said section is also incredibly subjective and opinionated, calling one side's armed forces "rubbish" and praising the other with inappropriate word choices. The use of words like "finally" also deviate from objectivity a lot. This page needs a serious, serious rework. The strange references to drug use read like a boulevard press article. Highly doubt the scientific merit of any of the latter sources. Right now it reads like a 4chan history post. 2A02:908:4B21:5B00:A4D0:F56A:80C0:1A04 (talk) 12:48, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]