Talk:Algernon Percy, 1st Earl of Beverley

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Biography: Peerage and Baronetage

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage.

Untitled

Removed Hon. George as it's neither fish nor fowl. He was Hon. from 1778-90 and Lord Lovaine from 1790-1830. Lord Beverly 1830-1865 and Duke '65-67. Re siblings sought a warrant of precedence as sons of a 'duke' as I see Hon. Charles + Emily - that should read Lord/Lady btw - all daughters would have become lady due to the 1790 earldom irrespective of seeking a warrant which raised charles to Lord. Alci12 19:00, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Give me some slack, I must have been tired at the time lol. Craigy (talk) 22:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]