This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cyprus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cyprus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyprusWikipedia:WikiProject CyprusTemplate:WikiProject CyprusCypriot
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt
I was cleaning up the syntax and style of the "History" section and noticed factual discrepancies between the information given by the original author and the information in the main source that he cites. Specifically (as an example): the wikipedia author says that Peter I learned of an imminent Egyptian attack on Cyprus, and so launched a preemptive war--whereas the article's author writes that Peter was financing and recruiting for the express purpose of attacking Alexandria, Egypt.
It's unlikely that the Egyptians had designs on Cyprus. Peter was financed by the Venetians. The mercantile machine there had markets for slaves, designs on the silk and spice trade and mercenaries looking for busy work. A good occasion for a raid on the chief rivals. Peter must have been suckered in with promises. Probably the article should be corrected, but then again, it does point to the contemporary cover-up of what was a real nasty post-holy war sting.Klasovsky (talk) 16:14, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]