Jump to content

Talk:Alexander Godley/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dank (talk · contribs) 11:36, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zawed, I'll get to this today. - Dank (push to talk) 11:36, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  Yes
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  Yes
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  Yes
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  Yes
    C. No original research:  Yes
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  Yes
    B. Focused:  Yes
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  Yes
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  Yes
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  Yes. Images are good.
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  Yes
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Passed.