Talk:Aleksandar Vučić

Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aleksandar Vučić article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed. Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Aleksandar Vučić. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Aleksandar Vučić at the Reference desk.

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Serbia: Belgrade High‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Belgrade task force (marked as High-importance).

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

RfC: Infobox image[edit]

The RfC expired today (15 July) and the last comment was made on 17 June. There is a clear consensus (5-2 amongst the participants) to keep the current image (A). --Vacant0 (talk) 13:50, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Which image should be used in the infobox? The A one is of Vučić in 2019, while B is of him in 2022. I am personally for image B, as it is more recent and I believe that enough time has gone by for a new image to be added. --Bakir123 (talk) 11:42, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A (current image)
B
C

I'd rather keep the current image (A), considering that his appearance has not changed that much since 2019. But between the 2022 photos, C looks better than B. --Vacant0 (talk) 11:57, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'd go for option B, more recent and good quality image. Elserbio00 (talk) 12:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There has been a previous RfC on this and while the alternate images may have changed the arguments for (A) being preferred are still the same. It has better framing, good use of contrast and good ratio of the subject to background. (A) is the superior image. AlanS^talk 12:38, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Option A. His appearance hasn't changed at all since 2019. After all, WP:AINTBROKE. 〜 Festucalex • talk 13:20, 15 June 2023 (UTC) (Summoned by bot)[reply]
A is just a much better photo. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 14:51, 15 June 2023 (UTC) PS: I would go with C as a second choice, if "A" is thought to be too old a photo (too young-looking). The "B" picture is really unflattering. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 00:45, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A might well be the better image - but I think he looks noticeably younger in it. Seems more jowly now, skin doesn't look as young, and greyer hair. I'd go with B as I think it's better than C. Nfitz (talk) 21:06, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I guess that's a reasonable point. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 00:45, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A - B & C are worse. Alexcs114 :) 17:03, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.