Talk:Aldwych tube station/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Looks reasonable at first glance. I'll start a detailed review as soon as possible. Alzarian16 (talk) 10:56, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Alzarian16 (talk) 10:56, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

Very good overall. A few minor issues, but nothing too substantial.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
Maybe a few too many long acronyms, but that's not a big issue.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
No issues here. Almost has more sources than it needs in places, e.g. citing the same piece of text to two different issues of the London Gazette in paragraph 2 of Planning.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Generally good. Might be worth adding a screen shot from one of the movies to illustrate the Use in films and television programmes section at some point.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Impressive work, especially considering how it looked a month ago. Well worth GA status. Alzarian16 (talk) 11:38, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]