Talk:Albrecht Rodenbach

Albrecht Rodenbach was a good article, but it was removed from the list as it no longer met the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.
Review: March 3, 2007.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Belgium Low‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholic Small

Is "small catholic seminary" the translation of "klein seminarie"? I would use "catholic 'small seminary'" instead, since the adjective "small" is part of the official name (I think), and not just a description of the seminary. -Michaël 14:54, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought about that, but the English just didn't flow. Since 'kleine' is both descriptive and nominative, little is lost to the English speaking audience by using the more common phraseology. Bejnar 16:33, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Except it's wrong. A "kleinseminarie" is a secondary school for children that will go on to become priests (in the "grootseminarie"). The correct term is minor seminary. -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 15:13, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA

I was looking this over, and I think this article is not even close to current GA standards. The article is too short, not entirely referenced. I hope any editors who have previously edited this article can expand it further and improve the status of the article. Nishkid 64 01:02, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The appropriate length of an article depends upon the subject. This young man died when he was 23 years old. Please state what is missing from the article. As to referencing, what do you consider a model article in terms of references? Note that almost all published material about him is in Flemish. --Bejnar 02:43, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flemish references can be used in the article. There is no restriction against that. For a GA, I am hoping this article would have at least 10 references, or however many is needed to cover the article throughout. As for the length, I was looking at the article at the Dutch Wikipedia and found that the length was much longer. If the length there is long, why can't it be that long here? I have to go now, but I'll add more comments later. Nishkid 64 02:52, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA/R

I know the notification is a bit late, but this article has been sent to WP:GA/R for a Good Article review. Homestarmy 23:40, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Albrecht Rodenbach. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311203435/http://users.pandora.be/VNJ-Mere/albrecht_rodenbach.htm to http://users.pandora.be/VNJ-Mere/albrecht_rodenbach.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:37, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]