Talk:Albion Market

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera

Spin-off?

I've altered the opening sentence to remove the reference to the show being a spin-off from "Coronation Street". To be a spin-off, there would need to be either shared characters or locations, and as far as I can see neither of these apply. Jon Rob 10:58, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is still described as a "companion" to Coronation Street, but it is not clear in what sense. Apart from the unsourced publicity comment comparing it to Coronation Street in terms of its hoped-for longevity, and its Manchester setting (hardly surprising for Granada TV), there is nothing really in this article to establish the link between the two series. Were there any shared characters, at least at the beginning? Credulity (talk) 17:03, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not encyclopedic

This article is not encyclopedic. It is an opinion peice. 71.52.60.61 (talk) 22:16, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree -- I've updated the 'attention required' template accordingly. A total rewrite, conforming to WP:NPOV, would be really useful. --Smatthewman 11:45, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've attempted to neutralize the article. Is this OK? -- 82.69.9:61 (talk) 17:36, 1 February 2007‎ (UTC)[reply]