This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Albert II, Duke of Austria is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles
I'm not convinced that Albert I was an emperor, though he was crowned King of the Romans at Aachen, I believe, and later recognised as emperor elect by Boniface VIII.
But for all I know there may be other schools of thought on this - certainly from the fifteenth century onwards emperors elect were counted as emperors. I'm nervous of changing this without a second opinion, particularly in view of the redirect under the title of Albert's page.--qp10qp19:24, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I've now changed it to "son of Albert I of Germany, Rex Romanorum". After making the above comment, I found two more monarchs incorrectly described as emperors in other articles and have changed those entries too. In the absence of a discussion, I'm reasonably sure of my ground, having once learned all the emperors off by heart; but I'm willing to be corrected if I've missed something. I wonder if these articles were copied up by people (and I'm grateful to them for the work) who were not particularly familiar with medieval history or Latin and who thought the term "Rex Romanorum" meant "Holy Roman Emperor" and needed translating to make that clearer.
