Talk:Albarracín
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merge
[edit]I'm against the proposed merge, the taifa is a historical entity clearly different from the modern town. --Jotamar (talk) 17:34, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- I am also against.--Morisco (talk) 02:41, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
- There is no way this should be deleted. The early Christian kingdoms and many of the Muslim ones are well chronicled on this site, there is no reason that this kingdom should not be. Definitely could use more research though because it is out there. -Clark Sui (talk) 08:56, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Albarracín. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090311233825/http://www.ine.es/intercensal/index to http://www.ine.es/intercensal/index
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090813054947/http://www.ine.es/inebase2/leer.jsp?L=0&divi=DPOP&his=0 to http://www.ine.es/inebase2/leer.jsp?L=0&divi=DPOP&his=0
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:08, 29 June 2017 (UTC)