Talk:Alban people

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy Mid‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ethnic groups Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Comments

I add my support to splitting the article into sections. A couple possibilities may include: perceptions of Alba Longa, Origin of the Albani, etc. Next, I was a bit confused by all the bolded words - where they meant to be links to other articles? It may be useful to look those up on Wikipedia and see if there are articles related to them. Lots of detailed information here - a table of contents and section division lines (see code for other articles) may be very useful. Good luck! - Eugenia Gabrielov 129.105.4.184 15:50, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have two main comments. First, I would consider splitting this article in sections. For instance, a specific section for geography would make it easy for reader interested in the location of Alba Longa to find the relevant information.

Second, most of this aricle appears to be focused on Alba Longa. While the information is really more about the activities of the Albani while at Alba Longa, my first impression was that I was reading an aricle on Alba Longa. The information here doesn't seem to be reflected in the Alba Longa article, so you might consider rephrasing the information to focus more on the role of the Albani as a people and less on the city in which their actions took place. This is just personal preference though - it might be awkward to phrase it differently.

Regarding content, I'd like to see more discussion about what information, in the eyes of modern historians, is considered to be fact and what is considered to be legend. For instance, Livy is a wonderful source but even he awknowledges in his first book that some of what he says is more likely legend than fact. In a couple of instances he even gives two version of the story - one legend and one which he believes to be more likely true. Modern historians will count even more of it as legend.

You're second paragraph in some ways covers this (the legend of Aeneas vs. archaeological evidence of the location). But you don't cover (if they exist) archaeological views of the founding date or the origins of the people. (Unless evidence corroborates the Aeneid).

DavidBild 02:28, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with David that the article would be clearer if there were distinct sections which seperated the topics. I found it easy to get lost while reading because each paragraph covered a completely different subject about the Albani people. Maybe if you created a header for each paragraph and expand the intro sentences, it would make the article easier to understand.

In terms of content, I would've liked to read more about the city's hegemonic role as the head of the league of city-states: how do the sources vary and why? Also, more information about the city's eventually destruction and the war the led to it would have been interesting. As a minor sidenote, I would've liked if there was a numerical distance mentioned concerning the location of the city relative to Rome, because I wasn't sure where any of the geographical locations cited where. Other than that, I found the article really interesting.

Stephanie Sutter 11:18pm, 14 May 2007

I agree with the other comments about splitting the article into sections. It's somewhat difficult to follow. The actual information contained within the article is good though. I don't think that the title for the References section is correctly formatted and a lot of your references seem to be repeated. Perhaps you should include a map that contains the location of Alba Longa.Asaunders906 16:47, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Alexandra Saunders[reply]

Great information, good job on following your editors' many helpful comments. There is more information on Alba Longa than the Albani, but that's largely a matter of the sources. Anisekstrong 01:57, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Anise K. Strong[reply]