Talk:Alan J. Hawkins (academic)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alan J. Hawkins (academic) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Brigham Young University

	Alan J. Hawkins (academic) is part of WikiProject Brigham Young University, an attempt to write quality articles about Brigham Young University. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Brigham Young UniversityWikipedia:WikiProject Brigham Young UniversityTemplate:WikiProject Brigham Young UniversityBrigham Young University
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 August 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Notability

Some may ask "Is Hawkins more notable than some of the people who have re-links in the article". The answer is no. More comments in a minute.Johnpacklambert (talk) 18:42, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Fagan deserves an article. He was the foundering of the scholarly journal Fathering. It has a longer full title. I am still disgruntled at the unjustified, uncolsulted deletion of the article on Marie Cornwall who is the current editor of the Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion and I think the only editor that journal has had who does not have an article on them in wikipedia. So I am reticent to create too many articles, at times it seems to attrack delete-happy administrators, who will admit after deleting the category "Souther Baptists", and I quote "I know nothing about American Protestant Denominations". So why in the world did the guy delete a category that he knew nothing about?Johnpacklambert (talk) 18:46, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so there is no article on The Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion's first editor Ralph Hood. I would say there ought to be. Maybe it is not clear if that journal is one that gives the editor-in-chief notability, but at least people should engage this clear attempt to prove notability and not engage in a speedy deletion without even giving anyone the chance to post a hang-on.Johnpacklambert (talk) 18:50, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't a part of the action on either of those articles, but I would say that being an editor of a journal that has an article does not automatically confer notability to its editor(s). If the journal is major and well-known outside its academic area, such as Lancet or JAMA, then an exception might be made to that, but otherwise, no. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 22:42, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]