This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Notability

Pre-emptive notability argument since this always happens:
Alan Blacker is an easy pass for WP:BASIC as he has received significant coverage over multiple years in multiple independent, reliable sources (particularly the BBC, Wales online, the Law Society Gazette, and the Manchester Evening News). Note that these sources with an all-UK and all-Wales audience. FOARP (talk) 11:15, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Further reference sources are the Solicitors Regulation Authority and the Charity Commission. Alastairm66 (talk) 08:09, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rewording

May I suggest a review of the sentence "Appearing before the tribunal, Blacker claimed that he had successfully sued the SRA for libel, a claim the SRA denied, and that the judge before the tribunal anyway dismissed due to lack of corroborating evidence - a lack that Blacker blamed on a non-disclosure agreement that he alleged had been signed with the SRA."

Specifically the section " ...and that the judge before the tribunal anyway dismissed due to lack of corroborating evidence... " I'm not clear what it refers to :-) Alastairm66 (talk) 08:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've reworded the sentence, hopefully that makes it clearer. Xii Xii 09:56, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]