Jump to content

Talk:Alan Becker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:51, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kick & run

[edit]

Sonic needs running & Nintendo, Apple needs BFDIA nothing as music. Nintendo, Elgoog in China, the Sega, Apple iPhones & iPads. Also the Number 3 & Letter R, Team 3 & R place running teams. 2001:4450:81BD:8F00:5554:7F62:1690:2D9D (talk) 17:35, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What? Lybfour (talk) 16:46, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source assessment

[edit]
Source assessment table
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
Noblit, Jenniferddd. "Becker shooting for 4th 'Animator vs. Animation' installment". Dublin Villager. Yes Not listed at WP:RSP Yes ? Unknown
Becker, Alan (June 3, 2016). "The Story of Animator vs. Animation – 10 Year Anniversary". No YouTube channel No Self-published Yes No
"Animator vs. Animation Game". ALAN BECKER. November 20, 2018. Archived from the original on February 27, 2019. Retrieved February 27, 2019. No alanbecker.net No Self-published No
"Animator vs Animation, The Official Card Game". Kickstarter. Retrieved February 21, 2018. No Fundraising campaign No Self-published No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Sadly, there still seems to be a dearth of substantial coverage so far. Nonetheless, as an inclusivist-leaning editor, I personally wouldn't wish for flat-out deletion regardless. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 16:03, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

finally

[edit]

there is an alan becker wiki!!1!1!! NotThisMF (talk) 17:00, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements possible with new site found?

[edit]

I found that the Turkish equivalent of this article cites this WSJ article. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB118246879823244172 In my opinion, this will significantly improve the article, and hopefully push this article up to a C class article. I can't actually see all of the WSJ article because I can't pay for WSJ. 2603:80A0:1700:3590:F04E:E54B:5470:4524 (talk) 20:10, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why is nobody responding??? 2603:80A0:1700:3590:45F8:8207:F23C:95B0 (talk) 01:57, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]