Talk:Alamat ng Gubat

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

Let me begin by saying that other than having a complete set of his books, and being rather envious of his popularity, I am in no way connected to Bob Ong. That said, I submit that this book is notable under criterion #5, which states:

* The book's author is so historically significant that any of his or her written works may be considered notable. This does not simply mean that the book's author is him/herself notable by Wikipedia's standards, rather that the book's author is of exceptional significance and the author's life and body of work would be a common study subject in literature classes.

On the other hand, the academic acknowledgement of Ong's body of work has not arrived yet - not in a country where the literary community is so small and so enamoured with formal movements.

But I submit that the unusual popular acknowledgment accorded to Bob Ong books is a mark of his significance. In a country where the reading of books is not considered "pleasurable", Bob Ong's books are genuinely phenomenal, matching on a national scale the success of popular books like, say, "Twilight" on the world stage. (I think Bob Ong books are much better, but that's subjective.) In fact, if he weren't the author of these books, I suppose the measure of their notability would be that they are big enough phenomena to be worthy of being mentioned in a Bob Ong book! -- Alternativity (talk) 17:13, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alamat ng Gubat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080202204303/http://showbizandstyle.inquirer.net/sim/sim/view_article.php?article_id=10060 to http://showbizandstyle.inquirer.net/sim/sim/view_article.php?article_id=10060

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:03, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]