Talk:Al Qaeda Handbook

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Apparently possession of this book is illegal in some countries? Where? What language is it written in (English or Arabic)? The Jade Knight 22:14, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Al Qaeda Handbook

This article seems to largely be about the "Al Qaeda Handbook"; it seems to me this should probably be moved there, pending possible future expansion of its scope. Alai 21:10, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A handbook is not the same thing as an encyclopedia. The Al Qaeda Handbook is not an encyclopedia and isn't called one. Rlitwin 14:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Who wrote it?

The article currently says it was "...allegedly written by al Qaida." I read an article about it that specified an author of the "Manchester Manual" -- he wasn't a member of al Qaida. It named an estimated date too. Late 1990s as I recall.

Without a source to substantiate that the manual was written by al Qaida I think it should be renamed.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 09:09, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had asked in Talk:Encyclopedia of Afghan Jihad (but never got a response there):

Does anyone know if this is the same "Encyclopedia of Jihad" that Moazzam Begg and Khalil al-Deek were suspected of working on, as said in this NY Times article?

-- Randy2063 (talk) 23:51, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The manual was written by a man named Ali Mohamed. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Ali_Mohamed He worked for, among others, the Central Intelligence Agency. It was published on the USDOJ website, and indeed is still available there. Even more absurd, it's available on Amazon. http://www.amazon.com/Qaeda-Manual-Government-Printing-Office-ebook/dp/B00EDQIG62/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1404766872&sr=8-1&keywords=al+qaeda+manual. You'll have to ask someone with less sense than a houseplant to explain just how it can be illegal to own something published and made freely available by the government. I'm sure Khalid Khaliq would like to know, too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.219.170.95 (talk) 21:14, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

responsible use of tags...

I excised a bogus tag. Geo Swan (talk) 20:21, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

apparent confusion

The one that the Nottingham Two got in trouble over was written by factions connected with the Muslim Brotherhood at various times from the 1930s to the 1980s, and actually has little ascertainable connection with al-Qaeda. It is apparently quite different from the "Encyclopedia of Afghan Jihad" and real al-Qaeda Anarchist Cookbook type manuals... AnonMoos (talk) 19:15, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm reading Kurt Eichenwald's "500 Days," and he pretty much demolishes the notion that the Manchester Manual (as he calls it) was written by or for al-Qaeda. If, as it appears, this article is about that document, then the article title & contents aren't NPOV. --Tbanderson (talk) 19:11, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

agreed

agree with the above * 500 days seems well written but very nonsensational * if all these things are true then more than the title needs changing * the both the brit and American govs employed this rather innocuous paper for propaganda * the chemical warfare section suggests cultivating rotten food * not high tech * 74.78.15.101 (talk) 16:20, 22 May 2014 (UTC)grumpy[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Al Qaeda Handbook. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110816180449/http://freehicham.co.uk/about-2/ to http://freehicham.co.uk/about-2/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:32, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Al Qaeda Handbook. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120604232419/http://www.jtfgtmo.southcom.mil/storyarchive/2007/August/081407-2-manmanual.html to http://www.jtfgtmo.southcom.mil/storyarchive/2007/August/081407-2-manmanual.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:16, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]