Talk:Al Joudi v. Bush
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Al Joudi v. Bush. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Replaced archive link http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Flistproc.ucdavis.edu%2Farchives%2Flaw-lib%2Flaw-lib.log0701%2Fatt-0174%2F01-GITMO_AttyList.pdf&date=2008-08-18 with http://www.webcitation.org/5aAGJXzox?url=http%3A%2F%2Flistproc.ucdavis.edu%2Farchives%2Flaw-lib%2Flaw-lib.log0701%2Fatt-0174%2F01-GITMO_AttyList.pdf on http://listproc.ucdavis.edu/archives/law-lib/law-lib.log0701/att-0174/01-GITMO_AttyList.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.pegc.us/archive/OK_v_Bush/govt_resp_to_GK_20060815.pdf
- Replaced archive link http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnatseclaw.typepad.com%2Fnatseclaw%2Ffiles%2FHamdan.28j.letter.pdf&date=2008-09-30 with https://web.archive.org/web/20081002190428/http://natseclaw.typepad.com/natseclaw/files/Hamdan.28j.letter.pdf on http://natseclaw.typepad.com/natseclaw/files/Hamdan.28j.letter.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.pegc.us/archive/In_re_Gitmo/gov_mot_to_dismiss_20070419.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:35, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Update
[edit]I recently expanded to provide clarifications based on the court decisions, including the March 2008 dismissal. Still, I have not found information about any effort from the petitioners after the June 2008 Boumediene v. Bush Supreme Court decision. I appreciate edits to have an updated closure to this case and the petitioners' effort. Thank you. Path2space (talk) 12:41, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Start-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class Human rights articles
- Low-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles