Talk:Al-Manshiyya, Acre

Palestine Mid‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Middle East B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

map

This map applies but I don't know if it will fit :). Zero^talk 02:50, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I´ve added that ( and the Jacotin-map) to the commons-cat. Huldra (talk) 14:57, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Daher el-Omar

Some of those who have uploaded pictures of the graveyard to commons, write that Daher el-Omar is buried there. None of the sources I have (Khalidi, Petersen) mentions this. Does anyone have a source for this claim? Huldra (talk) 14:57, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Volney says his head was pickled and sent as a trophy to Constantinople, but he doesn't say what happened to the rest. Zero^talk 15:57, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Figures for 1945

Hello, I think there is a problem in the way the data for 1945 are given. According to the two (related) sources, the Statistics of 1945 and Hadawi 1970, there were indeed 810 Muslim inhabitants, but also 270 Jews (who are missing in the article). On the other hand, the data for the agriculture, land, etc, which are given here in the article, are the total data (separated in Arabs, Jews, Public and Others in the 1945 Statistics, and Arabs and Jews in Hadawi). It is rather misleading for the readers. I think either one gives the data only for the Muslim population (saying that it is partial), or one mentions all the inhabitants. I cannot correct myself as I have not enough contributions on WP-en (I am mainly contributing to Wp-fr). Thank you in advance, --Cgolds (talk) 20:40, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cgolds, I added Jewish residents to the sentence based on the same Village Statistics source. Thank you, nableezy - 20:44, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nableezy Thanks a lot for this vey quick answer :) ! --Cgolds (talk) 20:49, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh. The 1945 data are deficient far, far more than one place. My hope was to have two tables, like in the Zarnuqa or Raml Zayta articles, in all the places where the Village Statistics, 1945 are referred to. (That is 800−900 articles) Alas, inserting all those tables is desperately boring work, which I suppose is why it hasn't been done so far, Huldra (talk) 21:57, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but what will be the sources for these tables, if not the 1945 data ? Or Hadawi, but as far as I can see for the moment, it is the same (with some grouping). Also I am not sure about your answer : does it mean that there no Jews in fact in this village, despite the 1945 data and Hadawi. Or is it a more general remark ? We are translating these articles on the French Wp and you have done an excellent job, really ! Thanks, --Cgolds (talk) 14:59, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. And yes, it was a general remark; I think more work is needed (in most cases), wrt to the 1945 data. As I said, I think the "goal" should be to have all the info in tables, like in the Zarnuqa, Raml Zayta and Kafr Thulth articles. And yes: I have mostly used the Hadawi numbers for those tables, with a link to the "original" 1945 numbers. This, simply because the Hadawi numbers are far more easy to read. Also note: a lot about the 1948 stuff are missing from these 1948 villages, Huldra (talk) 23:18, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we are aware of it, but for the moment I am mostly doing translations from your articles with due references to them. It is not easy to have access to certain books here. I must say that I am really surprised by the differences between the Survey of Palestine Fund 1881 data and the 1887 data for the moment ! Thanks again and all the best--Cgolds (talk) 16:53, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]