Talk:Al-Arab News Channel

Media Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Arab world Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

page move discussion

Does anyone object to moving this to al-Arab News Channel, following WP:MOS-AR#Definite_article (and WP:NAME - no sources seem to call this "Alarab News Channel")?

Boud (talk) 23:53, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Boud (talk) 21:47, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

dedication to free speech vs claims to be dedicated to free speech

In this edit, Kendrick7 wondered why we should refer to al-Arab's dedication to free speech to be a claim rather than a fact, stating "i see no reason to doubt their word".

It seems to me that for a person or organisation to state that s/he/it is dedicated to free speech is a very strong claim. E.g. compare with "The Democratic People's Party of Wikistan is democratic" in Democratic People's Party of Wikistan. The organisation has done nothing so far, and might never even exist! The politicians and organisations X who claim to promote free speech generally are criticised sooner or later by people or organisations Y who claim that X is/are hypocritical.

There is also the problem of how to define free speech - in different countries/legislative regions there are different definitions.

A slightly different argument: what WP:RS do we have that say that al-Arab really "is dedicated to free speech"? On the basis of just a few hours of programming, it can't really be more than a statement of intentions, not a description of real activities. (The Electronic Frontier Foundation has been active for many years; claims that it is, or is not, dedicated to free speech could reasonably be made based on studying the EFF's past activities - or its failures to act.)

It really seems to me that for WP:NPOV, we should put this as a claim rather than a fact. The wording can be different, e.g. "state that they..." instead of "claim to", which would probably be a little more neutral (the word "claim" could be interpreted to imply that the claim is contested). But the logical meaning should be that it's a claim, not a fact, IMHO. Boud (talk) 21:47, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You make a fair point should we assume that the channel never gets back on its feet. Were we to start talking in the past tense (i.e. that it was an "Arabic-language news channel") then it would indeed be no more than a claim. Modo liceat vivere, est spes (while there's life, there's hope). -- Kendrick7^talk 04:36, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The point is independent of when/if the channel starts broadcasting again. Wikipedia follows WP:NPOV and WP:NOR. The interpretation of being "dedicated to free speech" is an interpretation of the facts; this is called "original research" in Wikipedia terminology. Please provide a source for al-Arab being dedicated to free speech. Boud (talk) 23:28, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're correct; I've given too much weight to something a Slate (magazine) headline writer threw together. I've reworded and added an additional source. -- Kendrick7^talk 00:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]