Talk:Akatsuki-class destroyer (1931)

Ships C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Military history: Maritime / Asian / Japanese / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force
	World War II task force

Japan: Military history Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 23:43, October 24, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Turrets

The article describes the enclosed twin five-inch gun mountings as 'gun turrets', but then back-pedals on this, calling them next 'gunhouses' and then technically 'gun mountings' rather than 'true turrets'. This is, of course, problematic. Not least for the lay reader, who is left their own devices in how to understand what these large, fully-enclosed rotating gun positions were.

To clarify; they were turrets. They were fully enclosed, they provided protection and they facilitated the directing, elevation and thus aiming of the guns contained within. This meets the criteria for a gun turret. That they were unarmoured is not relevant to this definition. An armoured turret which has its armour plating removed and is left with just metal skin plating in place of the armour is still a turret as long as it functions mechanically and environmentally in the same manner that it did when equipped with armour.

Different points of view appearing in the main article in this manner serve not to enlighten, or to reinforce fact, but to confuse. Sadly, it is just a reflection of a completely benign and thoroughly natural human tendency; the tendency toward different perspectives between individuals. But we should strive for two key essentials within Wikipedia articles:

1) Consistency of language (even when it seems that the lexicon is being repeated frequently; science does just this, by the way, in the quest for accuracy).

2) Accuracy of ideas being communicated.

In this case, even if it means using the word 'turret' more times than some might feel comfortable with, we must remember that a good article can still be good whilst communicating to the reader as though they were a five-year-old. Let them leave with the idea firmly established and then reinforced that a turret is a turret, even if there was some technical discussion along the way. 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:8191:C1B:C557:2866 (talk) 00:17, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]