Talk:Airport '07/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Question: Does Peter reverse his car onto Quagmire's car? Same section, this sentence ---> "When they are in the air, Peter will drug the pilots", is the plan for Peter to drug the pilots? In the Production section, "organise" [That problem has been delth with. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 02:04, 25 June 2008 (UTC)] is spelled wrong. Same section, this sentence ---> "The sketch showing Quagmire becoming Joe's careworked", is it trying to say that Quagmire became Joe's careworker?
- Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:12, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- Question: Does Peter reverse his car onto Quagmire's car? Same section, this sentence ---> "When they are in the air, Peter will drug the pilots", is the plan for Peter to drug the pilots? In the Production section, "organise" [That problem has been delth with. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 02:04, 25 June 2008 (UTC)] is spelled wrong. Same section, this sentence ---> "The sketch showing Quagmire becoming Joe's careworked", is it trying to say that Quagmire became Joe's careworker?
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- If the above statement can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article! Also, contact me if the above statements are answered.
- Pass or Fail:
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:57, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, the plan was for Peter to drug the pilots. All the other problems have been fixed by TheBlazikenMaster and I. Qst (talk) 09:54, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- Well, after reading the article, I have gone off and passed the article. Congratulations. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you to TheBlazikenMaster and Qst who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:12, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- Qst deserves most of the credits, all I did was fixing the word organize into American English. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 15:23, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'd say that given all the times you've removed trivia from this article, and all the times you will in the future, I'd say you've done more than enough. :) Qst (talk) 15:28, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- Qst deserves most of the credits, all I did was fixing the word organize into American English. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 15:23, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- Well, after reading the article, I have gone off and passed the article. Congratulations. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you to TheBlazikenMaster and Qst who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:12, 25 June 2008 (UTC)