Talk:Air traffic control radar beacon system
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Corrected spelling errors. (IchBin 08:09, 1 January 2006 (UTC))
The general term that I've always met for the whole system is Secondary Surveillance Radar or SSR. I realise that the article mentions this as the ground-based component of the system, however I was under the impression that is also in common useage to describe the whole system. Is Air Traffic Control Radar Beacon System in normal useage anywhere (maybe outside technical circles)? BaseTurnComplete 17:42, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- You may be right about the "SSR" being a more commonly used term for the system. At least in my experience in the avionics buisness, both in AND outside of the technical circles, there's usually very little need to refer to the system as a whole, usually it's either "SSR", "ATC", or "radar" on the ground side or "transponder" on the airborne side. I would say "ATCRBS" is really not in common usage for that reason, and probably also because saying "at-crabs" sounds fairly bizzare, and pronouncing it as an abbreviation is rather long winded. But, since the system as a whole is officially referred to as ATCRBS in the sources I used to create the article, particularly in the authoritative TSO and the service manual cited, that's what I titled the article.
- Guess I should also point out that I do see ATCRBS in sales and technical information for transponder equipment, to differentiate mode A/C (ATCRBS) transponders from mode S transponders. Dunno, any thoughts? DirectEON 10:37, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
- Looks like it's a tricky one then. Maybe it's one that could be dealt with in the first few lines of this article, plus a redirect? Maybe something like "the whole system is commonly referred to as SSR, but ATCRBS is its correct name, strictly SSR refers the ground component") BaseTurnComplete 13:38, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
- Added that suggestion to the article, but as for redirects, secondary surveillance radar already exists .. hmm.. merging and all that is way beyond me, i'm just a peon :) -- DirectEON 14:42, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
Is discussion of the various beacon code blocks under the scope of this page or not. Like 1200 for basic VFR 12## for discrete VFR...., the emergency code blocks, SAR code, firefighter code, hot air baloon code.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.29.43.3 (talk) 19:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Air traffic control radar beacon system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130620040452/http://tomlusch.com/tomlusch/tomlusch/Invisible_transponders.html to http://tomlusch.com/tomlusch/tomlusch/Invisible_transponders.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:28, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Mode S vs ATCRBS
[edit]I think Mode S should be either split to a separate article or moved to Aviation transponder interrogation modes as, from the text of the article and definitions in https://scholar.afit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4157&context=etd, it isn't a part of ATCRBS. PaulT2022 (talk) 03:16, 14 August 2022 (UTC)