Jump to content

Talk:Air sac

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Air sacs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:02, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

what is this article about?

[edit]

I came to this article hoping to find out information about air sacs in birds and it's entirely about dinosaurs--which is not actually about air sacs. Should it be renamed? Could an article about air sacs be written? 018 (talk) 02:54, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article should just be expanded with more info on birds. FunkMonk (talk) 05:25, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can birds breathe through holes cut in their bones?

[edit]

Sylvia and Stephen Czerkas (who is definitely notable enough for an article) wrote on page 92 of "Dinosaurs: a Global View" (1990) that 18th century studies had apparently shown that birds could breathe through holes cut in their bones, due to their hollowness. This struck me as odd, since I have never read about it elsewhere. Is there anything to this, and even if there isn't, it should be added for historical context. I think MWAK has cited the book before, so maybe he has an idea... FunkMonk (talk) 05:33, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you block the pharynx of a bird, but cut his lower leg in half, he can still breath. I can't recall who first performed this, rather sadistic, experiment though.--MWAK (talk) 07:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The book mentions a treatise by Emperor Frederick II, but the date for the experiment is 1758, so seems they are unrelated... If true, worth a mention? Could be nice with a more specialised source, though... FunkMonk (talk) 07:52, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Frederick would have been just the type :o). However, the 1758 date allowed me to find the mad scientist responsible for this particular unethical experiment: John Hunter who blocked the windpipes of hawks and then cut through their wings. The experiment was carried out in 1758 but only published in 1774, when the text An account of certain receptacles of air in birds, which communicate with the lungs and eustachian tube was read to the Royal Society. Petrus Camper published the same structures in 1773 in the Verhandelingen van het Bataafsche Genootschap. The "air cells" as such were first published by William Harvey in 1653 in his On Generation page 7. See for all this: The works of John Hunter, with notes, ed. by J.F. Palmer. 4 vols., illustr. by a vol. of plates: https://books.google.nl/books?id=X7ITAAAAQAAJ&dq=experiment+%221758%22+John+Hunter&hl=nl&source=gbs_navlinks_s --MWAK (talk) 08:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Very interesting! Could certainly be a good addition here or in skeletal pneumaticity... FunkMonk (talk) 09:56, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This article should of course be completely rewritten. It consistently confuses the excavations within bones for the diverticula of air sacs with the air sacs themselves. And it doesn't seem to know that many mammals have air sacs too.--MWAK (talk) 17:11, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nyook

[edit]

Shut up boy Don’t delete my content I am the anonymous guy... Do you hate my fix? I do yours Cclenmon (talk) 06:39, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why don’t reply me? Cclenmon (talk) 06:43, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Air sec

[edit]

No 2401:4900:5276:C422:0:33:DC39:BD01 (talk) 17:23, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Janaba

[edit]

Kamhabababain. Hh hahabanmmjana. Hhab 91.75.130.79 (talk) 19:29, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Physiological Ecology of Animals

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2023 and 28 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Yadukulakambhoji (article contribs). Peer reviewers: IanKreciglowa, ZombieManF.

— Assignment last updated by ZombieManF (talk) 22:50, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eusaurischia is the first clade with air sac

[edit]

Eusaurischia (not saurischia) should be mentioned as the first clade with air sacs. Voproshatel (talk) 06:38, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Air_sac&oldid=1254900619"