Talk:Air Force Training Group RAAF

Australia: Military history Low‑importance

	Australia portal Air Force Training Group RAAF is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Military history: Aviation / South Pacific

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force

SFN for citation

I think that changing to {{sfn}} is a good idea as it improves usability of an article by linking between cited short sources and full sources. I think we should use in this article.Clare. (talk) 05:10, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree -- I think the existing style, which displays author and short title, is more useful for the casual reader, who shouldn't be expected to click every citation link to find a book title. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:00, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting point, why do you think a casual reader is more interested in a book title than the year of publication? Clare. (talk) 05:10, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mm, when someone asks you what book you're reading, do you normally give them the title, or the year of publication? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 15:04, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]