Talk:Ahmedabad/GA1

GA Review

Pass

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ankit Maity (talk · contribs) 06:57, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- Wikilinks should only be made if they are relevant to the context. Common words do not need wikilinking. Fixed
- Spelling mistake: "Mugal" → "Mughal" Fixed
- Grammatical errors such as "A image" found. Fixed
- Avoid peacock terms, such as "beautiful", "famous", "popular", "well-known", "significant", "important" and "obvious". Fixed
- The lead should adequately summarize the content of the article. (I see the lead tells nothing about cuisine and all.) Fixed
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Web references need the author, publisher, publishing date and access date. Fixed
- More sources needed in "Etymology", "British rule", "Art and literature", "Air", "Rail", Education" & "Media". Fixed
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comment: Thanks for reviewing it. Can you please keep this open for 2 weeks or 3 during which I will address the issues. I'll make changes as soon as possible. Cheers! →TSU ^tp* 07:58, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If fixes happen within one week, only then you will get extra time.--Ankit Maity ^Talk _Contribs 15:48, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've just gone through the references and corrected them where necessary; fixed some citations for consistency (converting to {{cite}}) and added missing info where available. Ankit, would you mind tagging the bits you think need references (per GA criterion 2) with a {{cn}} template; it would help those of us trying to fix the article to focus our efforts. Cheers, Yunshui 雲‍水 12:01, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have also slightly expanded the lead to cover culture, sport and twin cities. Yunshui 雲‍水 12:26, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Whatever I could.--Ankit Maity ^Talk _Contribs 15:53, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, will try and work on them today. Yunshui 雲‍水 06:39, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, have added citations for all but three of the tags. Two I've removed because the text doesn't require citations for the purposes of GA (although obviously references would be good!), the one in the Etymology section I've left - I can't find a source for this saying in English sources, so I think one of our Indian editors (I'm looking at you, TSU!) will have to find it in the original Hindi. Yunshui 雲‍水 07:29, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Yunshi for your great efforts! I am getting more busy day by day and thus my activities might reduce but I will still be here. I have added to the popular saying (it was though) and as said by Yunshi, other 2 things didn't needed to be cited. So Ankit, can you change the mark at references if it is okay now. I m working on other fixes too. Cheers! →TSU ^tp* 08:23, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've now removed all of the irrelevant wikilinks I could find. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:16, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, just some tasks more.--Ankit Maity ^Talk _Contribs 11:28, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I think I've addressed everything. I've removed irrelevent wikilinks; double-checked spelling, grammar and tone (although I may have missed some things, it's a long article!); expanded the lead a bit (and removed the references from it); added full details to those citations where such detail was available and unified them all under the {{cite}} template format; and added citations to all those sections that required it. Ankit, please could you re-review when convenient and let us know if there's anything more you feel needs to be done? Yunshui 雲‍水 12:24, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just add the reference and then I will pass this GA request.--Ankit Maity ^Talk _Contribs 16:16, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~I m little confused here. Can you please clarify that what actually needs ref? Cheers! →TSU ^tp* 16:19, 26 June 2012 (UTC)~~[reply]

Never mind. Sorry, got it now. →TSU ^tp* 16:22, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For now, I provided 2 refs and removed 2 unsourced lines. I may re-add them in future if I got any sources. For now, I think that I have addressed your issue :) →TSU ^tp* 10:50, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.