Talk:Ahl-i Hadith
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ahl-i Hadith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120125033421/http://ahlehadees.org:80/en/index.php/about-us/17-ahle-hadiths-their-aims-and-objectives to http://ahlehadees.org/en/index.php/about-us/17-ahle-hadiths-their-aims-and-objectives
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:14, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
More attempts at subtle POV pushing
[edit]After checking out dishonest citations with The Muslim World After 9/11, I gave the lead a good lookover and realized that there's renewed POV pushing by this movement's theological opponents taking place. Similar to what was being pushed by Baboon43, Msoamu and other now banned Wiki-con artists, there was a definite attempt in the lead to push the view that Ahl-I Hadith, Salafism and Wahhabism are one and the same. This is also similar to the view people such as the above were pushing at the time: that Salafism and Wahhabism themselves are just one thing.
The view is convenient for followers of some Sufi movements as it allows them to cast aside all theological opponents as essentially one and the same, and ultimately connected to Saudi Arabia only. Not only is it historically ignorant, but also a great disservice to the encyclopedia and its readers. I'm leaving this comment here on the talk page just as a record that the renewed attempt has been noticed. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:24, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Listing of Dr Zakir
[edit]Dr Zakir Naik has confirmed in one of his lectures that he does not associate himself with Ahle Hadith or any group. This listing is false. Ishan87 (talk) 12:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Assalam alaikum please I want to know sayyida Aisha (a.h) full biography — Preceding unsigned comment added by 102.91.29.119 (talk) 14:02, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Ahl-e-Hadith
[edit]Shouldn't there be two hyphens?
— iFaqeer (talk to or email me) 23:46, 14 October 2024 (UTC) — iFaqeer (talk to or email me) 23:46, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class Islam-related articles
- Low-importance Islam-related articles
- C-Class Hadith articles
- Unknown-importance Hadith articles
- Hadith task force articles
- WikiProject Islam articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class British Empire articles
- Low-importance British Empire articles
- All WikiProject British Empire pages