Talk:Ah My Buddha

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

To other editors:

This article could definitely undergo some more style checks. Sentences are understandable, but overall the entire page lacks a feel of professionalism. I'll work on it as my daily workload allows.

Regards, Jacqueline M.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.91.110.150 (talk) 10:14, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To the editor before me:

Please upload images to Wikipedia first before using them in your articles. Also refer to Wikipedia:Image use policy. --Geopgeop 12:50, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

nm

To the other editors:

This article seemed biased towards certain characters, so I did some re-writing. I'm sorry, I'm not terribly familiar with Wikipedia policies, but as much as I like Kazuki-chan (and as pitiable as Ikkou's situation is) I felt I had to do something to make it sound more objective. I think this article might still lack professionalism, but I hope I've made it easier to work with for future editors and more helpful to the idly curious.

adn —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.210.69.63 (talk) 17:08, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Openers/ Closers

Does anyone know the artists for them? I know the actual names, but nothing more.

Season 1: Opening: (Afurete Yuku no wa Kono Kimochi) I'm pretty sure that's not the name, but that's what it says from what I have. Closing: Happy Days

Season 2: Opening: Amaenaideyo!! Closing: Lonesome Traveler —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chunky Milk (talk • contribs) 01:42, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not Harem

This series is not a harem anime. Only Chitose from the female cast is suspected of liking Ikko. The antagonist from the second season Kazuki is the only one that shows openly that she loves Ikko by the end. Some others only flirt but are not serious about actually wanting any relationship with him. Two girls does not constitute a harem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GrimoireMyst (talk • contribs) 21:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is definition of "harem anime" sounds controversial. I am not certain that it is necessary for the females to have an interest in the male lead in order to qualify this as "harem anime." Even in a real harem, you just need multiple women married to a single man to qualify. The distinguishing feature of harem anime is to have numerous attractive females surrounding a single male lead, which this show definitely features. If the convention of the harem anime genre decrees that the women must like him to be part of the harem, then perhaps one need only qualify "harem anime" by pointing out that it deviates from this particular convention, - and many shows, movies, books, etc. do deviate from particular conventions from time to time, even while mostly keeping to the spirit of a certain genre whose conventions they defy. - adn —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.129.201.140 (talk) 22:43, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is a harem anime. Not everyone liked the main guy in Love Hina, but it was a harem anime. Also shouldn't the main page read "Amaenaideyo, incorrectly translated to Ah my buddah in the US"? What they call it here is not correct by any stretch of the word. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.189.1.106 (talk) 04:41, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just being surrounded by female characters doesn't make it a harem if they are all just friends. Check the definition of harem anime on this very site or others and its says that multiple women (Three or more.) attracted or in love with one man. Same for a reverse harem where many men go after one women. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GrimoireMyst (talk • contribs) 20:03, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Making this article B-class

Anyone want to help me make this article B-class? Extremepro (talk) 12:27, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Review(s)

Mania.com: v1, v2, v3, v4, v5, v6

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ah My Buddha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:12, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Ah My Buddha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.comicgum.com/00_anime_ama.php
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.soleilmanga.com/lire_manga.php?id_manga=200
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.my-cartoon.com.tw/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=983&Itemid=1
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.my-cartoon.com.tw/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1030&Itemid=121
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mania.com/ah-my-buddha-vol-1_article_110496.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090709022448/http://www.at-x.com/program_detail/index.html?pid=1839&from=new%2F to http://www.at-x.com/program_detail/index.html?pid=1839&from=new%2F

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]