Talk:Agnes Irving

Australia: New South Wales / Maritime Low‑importance

	Australia portal Agnes Irving is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian maritime history (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Shipwrecks Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shipwreck-related priority open tasks:

To Do

Lady Elizabeth (1879)
- Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed!
- Improve grammar
- Add any additions if needed Still adding more information
- Discuss desired additions -None

Problems

Naming convention, why put the year? If there is another Anges Irving, this should be Anges Irving (ship).
Obvious that the further reading is a copy and paste job, not tailored to the specific article.
Grammar.
Unremarkable subject.

Nezzadar 22:46, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

First off, the article is about a ship wreck not a person so why the A7 tag?

Naming conventions for most vessels it is name of the vessel and then the year constructed as this ties back to their registration and removes ambiguity

You also jumped in whilst I was still editing grammar

as to unremarkable subject that is your point of view i.e. are you the arbitrator of what shipwrecks are significant and which ones are not? eg http://www.michaelmcfadyenscuba.info/viewpage.php?page_id=206

Whodidwhat (talk) 22:58, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the speedy deletion request. None of the "problems" cited above are reasons for speedy deletion, and boats do not meet the criteria for WP:CSD#A7. Any issues should be tagged for cleanup as needed. --Kinu ^t/_c 23:21, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was under the impression that A7 applied to unremarkable anything. So this falls through the cracks because it isn't a person, group, band, organization, web content, ect.? I am standing by my judgement that this needs to be deleted, but it isn't worth my time to edit war this by putting the tag back up.

Also:

My list of problems with the article was indepedant of the CSD.
Don't publish things that are not ready to be published. If grammar is poor, fix it, don't publish it.
Don't ask me to remove a CSD tag by placing a poorly worded and unsupported request on my talk page. I'm not an admin, so I really can't normally remove CSDs. Furthermore, I find it mildly offensive that you would have the nerve to ask me to back off on a judgment I made without giving me a reason to do so.

Nezzadar 05:43, 10 October 2009 (UTC)