Talk:Agaricus
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Agaricus and Agarical cover the same genus (prior proposal merge with Agaricales incorrect because that is an order). RJFJR 16:22, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
Homeopathy
[edit]The homeopathy claims in this article didn't appear to have any current notability - no source from this decade mentions it's use? PouponOnToast (talk) 00:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Changes
[edit]Following the example of Cortinarius (and others), I'm moving the long list of Agaricus species to its own page. It's not terribly useful right now, but I'll have a go and see what I can do with it. This page could use a serious overhaul as well... time to do some reading! Sasata (talk) 05:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
pictures
[edit]Speaking as an ignoramus, not even a novice, I see a substantial difference between the two pictures of specimens of Agaricus campestris in the article. The stipes are of relatively different thicknesses. Does this matter? Likely enough I am mistaken.
Sorry I haven't worked out how to show the pictures properly.Chjoaygame (talk) 18:01, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a7b9/9a7b97a4c15e5735ec9ad808656a66de039fd439" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12a63/12a636589ded8f0adf4f3a51c9df18a1dbe7532e" alt=""
- I've placed the images above without the taxoboxes. Plantdrew (talk) 20:24, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Not only does there seem to be a difference between the stipe thicknesses, but also it is hard to see the gills of the mushroom in the single picture; they look pale. For Agaricus campestris of that size and maturity, I would expect to see the gills with a dark colour, darker than I see in the picture.Chjoaygame (talk) 20:44, 13 February 2025 (UTC)