Talk:Against Therapy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Against Therapy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Evaluation for Psych 101

This article could be improved by drawing more extensively from the references provided to give a fuller picture of Masson's background in literary studies and his history of invective against psychotherapy in general and Freud and his disciples in specific. Also of use would be clarification about the enormous rift that now exists between the thought of Freud in the early 20th century and actual contemporary psychotherapeutic (and even psychoanalytic) practice, which, while influenced by Freud's digging into the past of patients to provide clues to the resolution of present conflicts, is far from adherence to Freud's original psychoanalytic method, the method Masson inveighs against. --Kevinhilke (talk) 20:20, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article could be improved by deleting biased sources funded by Psychiary and the pharmaceutical industry. Namely, The New York Times and Time Magazine. And just what is a more slash and burn argument than this very Wikipedia article? Does the NY TImes and Time tell us why it's a waste of time? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.183.185.133 (talk) 22:30, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:NPOV. We don't remove sources simply because editors dislike them or disagree with what they say. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 22:39, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]