Talk:Aga Khan Development Network

International development Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International development, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of international development, including such areas as appropriate technology, microfinance and social issues, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International developmentWikipedia:WikiProject International developmentTemplate:WikiProject International developmentInternational development articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aga Khan Development Network article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Izhar Hunzai

The article on Izhar Hunzai was retained following an AfD here. The balance of opinion was that it should be merged into here. If an editor is unhappy then the answer is a second AfD on which I would abstain because of my involvement thus far. BlueValour 23:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The inclusion of the Izhar Hunzai section in this article does not make sense. He is one program manager among many in a vast international organization comprising multiple agencies that each run multiple programs. There is nothing remarkable about his personal contribution to the organization that warrants his inclusion in this article. Including a section on his is akin to profiling a particular mid-level employee of Microsoft on their wiki article.

If, in the wisdom of the wikipedia community, the Izhar Hunzai content is valuable enough to be preserved it should be done elsewhere - perhaps within its own article. Dumping its content inappropriately on this article is not the solution. I am not sure how this is to be resolved within Wikipedia policy / convention, but placing an AfD on this article is unwarranted.

Accordingly, I am moving the Izhar Hunzai back to its own page and I will place an AfD on that article. I will include a copy of this discussion thread to provide context.

-- Aylahs ^(talk) 17:05, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think this article reads like a promotional brochure. It would be good to know salient facts, like where does the money for the trust come from.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aga Khan Development Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111106113929/http://www.theismaili.org/cms/14/The-Aga-Khan to http://www.theismaili.org/cms/14/The-Aga-Khan

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:35, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AKDN after rebranding

There has been a lot of rebranding work done in 2022 that includes a complete revamping of the website, a new domain and logo etc. I hope the new theme is reflected on the article. I can see old logo still being used, it's probably time for a major update. Thoughts? Imranhunzai (talk) 22:26, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]