Talk:After Romeo
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Good faith edits
[edit]Before making or reverting the page, please have a look at the WP MOS pages to see why I am insistent on the copy edit. I can go to an administrator but I'm sure we can all reach a consensus here without that. Myrtle G. Myrtlegroggins (talk) 22:03, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Notability
[edit]The article claims that the group's single "Free Fall" reached #1 on the MTV chart. I don't know much about MTV, and am not much into music. But if the article's claim is true, perhaps the article meets either WP:BAND criterion #2 ("Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart") or #11 ("Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network"). Though I'm not sure that the MTV chart counts as a "national chart", and I have no idea whether or not MTV actually placed the video into rotation on television.
Dear Wikipedians: How likely do you think it is that the article meets at least one of these two criteria?
I especially would like to see at least one reply from an experienced Wikipedian.
Sigh. I wish Wikipedia's notability criteria were more stringent. I am unhappy with the amount of unsourced material which has been added to this article over time.
Cheers, —Unforgettableid (talk) 23:20, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hello, Unforgettableid.
I can hardly call myself an experienced Wikipedian! (My wiki-epitaph will probably read "was friendly and tried hard to learn the MOS"!) I don't know anything about the band - I was only loitering with an intent to copyedit :-) My feeling is that the article is of very low to very, very low importance and so if it gives the boys' fans some pleasure and some experience in editing then I am happy not to try to impose a notability edict. If the article we are discussing was of any greater importance then my feeling would be much more along your lines, for sure. I am aware that many people would not agree with my approach and that is ok. The people at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music might give an helpful opinion. Cheers, Myrtle G. Myrtlegroggins (talk) 07:18, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Ages
[edit]Whoever is making the ages younger than they are, please stop it. If it's one of the members of After Romeo, their manager, or anyone associated with them, shame on you for lying/hiding information to appeal to younger fans. I'm working on finding citations for the ages. Jayk is 22, Nevada state records don't lie, and Blake is 20, multiple newspapers from his home state don't lie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.174.252.90 (talk) 15:22, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (musicians) articles
- Low-importance biography (musicians) articles
- Musicians work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class Pop music articles
- Low-importance Pop music articles
- Pop music articles
- Stub-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- Stub-Class Los Angeles articles
- Low-importance Los Angeles articles
- Los Angeles area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles