Jump to content

Talk:Afro-Asians

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Book: A History of Overseas Chinese in Africa to 1911 by Li Anshan

[edit]

This seems like an interesting read. In reading the summary and browsing through the pages at Google/books, it seems to cover the global colonial system that dispersed Chinese laborers to the Caribbean, Latin America, the U.S. and parts of Africa like the Gold Coast and Senegal. The book might lead to some evidence of Afro-Asian births and/or populations emerging during those time as some of the laborers, or indentured servants, did not return to China. I've long bee curious of direct Asian ancestry existing among West Africans stemming from the colonial and Sino-African trade eras. This seems like it may be a good read and reference for anyone wanting to contribute to the article. Bab-a-lot (talk) 01:14, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


About prehistoric people in China

[edit]

It is crazy to assume that afro-asian intermarriage took place without any genetic or anthropology evidence. Using only speculations and theories could attract many strong criticism and manipulation by pan-nationalists on Wikipedia. You can't just edit an theory on Wikipedia like that when you lack all the evidence above.

  • There is no DNA evidence or anthropology to support this
  • There is no such identified people or population that exist anywhere today
  • No evidence negroid skeleton only homo-sapiens peking men

FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION OF SHANG

http://www.shakuhachi.com/K-9KChineseFlutes-Nature.html

" A careful study of the bones of 400 individuals removed from more than 300 graves indicates that the Jiahu ethnic group may be identified with the North Asian Mongolian group, and also with the Xiawanggang and Miaodigou groups in Henan Province and the Dawenkou, Yedian and Xixiahou groups that were later found in Shandong Province. The range of male heights was from 170 to 180 cm. In the late Palaeolithic Zhoukoudian Cave,`unspecialized' Mongoloids were described6. By the Yangshao period (3000 BC± 5000 BC)7, the skull measurements are `physically Chinese' and `modern'6. The physical similarity of the Jiahu people to the later Dawenkou (2600 BC±4300 BC) indicates that the Dawenkou might have descended from the Jiahu, following a slow migration along the middle and lower reaches of the Huai river and the Hanshui valley. "

http://donlehmanjr.com/China/china%20chapters/china%20book2/china23.htm China 23: The Shang, Invaders or Indigenous Racial & Cultural continuity, from Yangshao to the Shang.

" Racially the Shang were Mongoloids, like the preceding Yangshao and Longshan cultures. The Shang bones are indistinguishable from the Longshan. The Shang were not invaders from the Middle East. In addition to racial similarities, the Shang also shared cultural similarities with the Yangshao and Longshan cultures. "


92.236.36.173 (talk) 10:59, 5 November 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Permanlam (talk • contribs) [reply]

The fact that you THINK it's crazy is your opinion. I provided a source based on scientific research. I'm re-adding the text. Please discuss further before removing. Bab-a-lot (talk) 08:17, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

chinese men but not women

[edit]

why does it only mention chinese men but not women and why it only mentions chinese rather than asians as whole?--98.149.174.254 (talk) 20:10, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Philippines sub-section about the Aeta and Ati peoples

[edit]

A previous editor deleted the section. I motion to leave the section and discuss it, first. Bab-a-lot (talk) 08:11, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Term Afro-Asian - not strictly a term for modern populations

[edit]

I'd like to propose a discussion about the term Afro-Asian including peoples of genetic Afro-asian lineage who evolved outside of inter-race marriage. The article could clarify the difference between the two types of Afro-Asian peoples with an introduction section going into detail about the differences (in identity, etc) between ancient and modern, just as it describes differences based on geographic origin. Those differences could also be clarified in the introduction summary of the article.

Also, I'm re-adding the info about ancient Afro-Asian (non mixed race) populations until this has been discussed and explored further. My intention was NEVER to suggest that such peoples are mixed race, or products of racial or cultural fusion, but more of the genetic implications of being both African and Asian and the RANGE OF DIVERSITY of Afro-Asian peoples, of which they do qualify. Bab-a-lot (talk) 08:22, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Katanga Afro-Japanese: removed sentence concerning the postwar Constitution of Japan

[edit]

This sentence is sourced, the video media news interview from a major news network was cited. Let's discuss. Bab-a-lot (talk) 08:37, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



The entire page is poorly written and looks like it has a PRO black POV. notice that the Japanese blasian paragraph omits the fact that some Japanese women was ALSO raped by US occupation forces in the turmoil of post war Japan. If you want to make a legitimate wiki article dont sugarcoat it omitting unsavory facts ..

I also removed the line "Other women raised their child more rural or remote areas as blasian children were sought after and murdered in the city by Japanese officials." ANY evidence of this extraordinary claim ? The video SHOWS UNVERIFIED CLAIMS by residents and hearsay. so wikipedia allows gossip from random videos to be used as fact??? please provide legitimate verified sources to match your extreme claims.

Debunkpropaganda (talk) 03:19, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What constitutes verifed claims if not from the numerous victims and offspring, themselves? Are you saying that the survivors of this era have organized under false pretense?
And France 24 International News, the source of this information, is not a gossip site, but a fully reputable news corporation in France. The ENTIRE passage is sourced, as is. Bab-a-lot (talk) 15:27, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Huh?

[edit]

There appears to be no rhyme or reason to the #rank in the Population by state table. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 05:20, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply] 

Half Indonesia Half African ( Camerun ) Mohammed Kamga : http://foto-biodata.blogspot.com/2015/03/mohammed-kamga.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.0.236.90 (talk) 12:12, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Afro-Asian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:57, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bizarre claim

[edit]

Under the heading "Japan", is the following statement... "In recent history, the hike in the African-Japanese population has been linked to the American occupation of Japan following the end of World War II, where African-Japanese children were born through either prostitution, or legally binding marriage. "

That seems to be a very strange assertion. Is any person that has a child, while not legally married, "a prostitute" ?Lathamibird (talk) 07:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Afro-Asians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:35, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Afro-Asians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:13, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 06:43, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:22, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:17, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Scientifically Proper?"

[edit]

I have an issue with the line in the opening: "therefore Afro-Asian is a more scientifically proper term to describe Black Asians with direct African background or ancestry."

There is no citation as to where that is stated. I think that is highly subjective and simply more opinion than truth. I am going to remove it until someone backs it up. WHile the preceding part may be true, the second statement isn't.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dangling ref

[edit]

I have located a dangling ref and hidden it, replacing each with a citation needed tag. This has been done because we have a reference pointing to a sources that is not recorded in the article. Please feel free to contact me if you need assistance fixing this. - Aussie Article Writer (talk)

Removal of genetic analysis sources

[edit]

I removed a bunch of wp:synth readings of papers through a wp:fringe genetic existentialist lens. See discussions similar discussions at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eurasian (mixed ancestry) and Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Eurasian_(mixed_ancestry) —blindlynx 19:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Gender, Race and Computing

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 September 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Trollny (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Dududungha, Racoon dolphin, Salehadian, Rug005ucsd, Uwudubuwu, !777francis777!.

— Assignment last updated by J2singh (talk) 23:55, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article is full of misinformation from Chinese nationalists.

[edit]

Most of the unions are between black men and Chinese women, but Chinese people who are dissatisfied with this continue to post false information on Wikipedia. For example, he completely hides the huge number of black men and Chinese women couples in Guangzhou and pollutes them with miscellaneous articles. This article itself needs to be rewritten and rewritten.39.123.6.27 (talk) 14:42, 17 October 2024 (UTC) https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14649373.2023.2209425#d1e399[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Afro-Asians&oldid=1251690707"