Talk:Aerotel v Telco and Macrossan's application/to do
Areas for expansion
[edit]Suggested article sections to be added/modified:
- History behind the judgment
- Aerotel v Telco - grant by UK Patent Office
- Macrossan's application - refusal by UK Patent Office
- Macrossan's application - refusal by High Court
- Reception of judgment
- Can link and summarise commentaries by FFII, IPKat and patent attorneys.
- UK Patent Office response
- Needs more detail of their current practice - highlight some recent decisions of the Patent Office?
Please chip in and help where you can. GDallimore 18:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)