Jump to content

Talk:Aerotel v Telco and Macrossan's application/to do

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Areas for expansion

[edit]

Suggested article sections to be added/modified:

  • History behind the judgment
    • Aerotel v Telco - grant by UK Patent Office
    • Macrossan's application - refusal by UK Patent Office
    • Macrossan's application - refusal by High Court
  • Reception of judgment
    • Can link and summarise commentaries by FFII, IPKat and patent attorneys.
  • UK Patent Office response
    • Needs more detail of their current practice - highlight some recent decisions of the Patent Office?

Please chip in and help where you can. GDallimore 18:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]