Talk:Adventures of Mowgli

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Soviet and post-Soviet cinema task force.

Animation Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Soviet Union Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animals in media (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animals in media, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Animals in mediaWikipedia:WikiProject Animals in mediaTemplate:WikiProject Animals in mediaAnimals in media articles

Image copyright problem with Image:Bagheera 1967.jpg

The image Image:Bagheera 1967.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --14:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to move to "Adventures of Mowgli"

Why would the Russian transliteration be used here if an English version of the movie exists with Kipling's original name? Calling it "Adventures of Mowgli" looks perfectly reasonable to me. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 06:37, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the move (sorry for not responding; this is a busy time). According to IMDB, there are about 4 different names that it was released under in English: "Adventures of Mowgli", "Mowgli" (international Eng. title and copyright title), "Rudyard Kipling's the Jungle Book" and "The Jungle Book". And it was never released theatrically in English-speaking countries, only on cheap dollar-store DVDs as far as I can tell. There are plenty of films on Wikipedia that don't have English-language names, and there is no rule saying that they must. When there is no clearly preferred English name for a film, I think it is best to keep it under the original name. So I'm retroactively opposing the move. Esn (talk) 08:53, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care about the "Adventures of" part, but i think that it's unnecessary to write it in the "Russian" spelling "Maugli" just because IMDB has it as the main name. It's a transliteration from Russian, but it's an English word originally (Kipling wrote in English).

Compare it with Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson (film) and its name at IMDB. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 11:35, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reference #4 : "we dont wanna be like you"

Reference #4, in Russian, is not that clear.

I found the very intersting article from The Telegraph cited therein. Shouldn't it be included as a reference, too ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noliscient (talk • contribs) 15:55, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have split those references. Jirka.h23 (talk) 19:09, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]