Talk:Advaxis

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

this article reads like PR. it should be revised to reflect the standards of a respectable encyclopedia.

Yes, it's pretty poor right now. I've tried to do a little of this and I'll try to remember to come back and do some more. In the meantime, I've flagged it as having an advert-like tone (though it reads more like a press release to a medical journal) and perhaps another editor will come by with some improvments of their own. Astronaut (talk) 03:45, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Can someone explain why various editors thought it necessary to create {{Advaxis}}, {{Infobox advaxis}} and {{Infobox Advaxis}} when the standard {{infobox company}} is more than adaquate for the job? Astronaut (talk) 04:13, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Advaxis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120926001327/http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/industries/health-care/advaxis-department-homeland-security-agree-cooperative-research-development/ to http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/industries/health-care/advaxis-department-homeland-security-agree-cooperative-research-development/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is axalimogene filolisbac the same as ADXS-HPV

[1] says "FDA halts Advaxis Phase 1/2 study of axalimogene filolisbac after patient death" - Is it the ADXS-HPV in the WP article ? - Rod57 (talk) 13:53, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]