Talk:Admiral Beatty Hotel
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Admiral Beatty Hotel appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 September 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 14:59, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that following its closure, the former Admiral Beatty Hotel was converted into a senior citizens' apartment building? Source: https://atlanticbusinessmagazine.ca/web-exclusives/living-the-suite-life-at-97-year-old-admiral-beatty-hotel/,https://www.sjnph.net/rotary-admiral-beatty-complex (official website),https://da.tj.news/viewer?opub=Telegraph_Journal&date=19890605&page=21&filename=4870_TJ_1989_A (subscription only newspaper archive, talks about the hotel shutting down in 1982, proposals in 1984 to renovate the building for apartments suited for low-income families and the elderly, as well as its first tenants arriving in late 1985.)
- Reviewed:
Created by B3251 (talk). Self-nominated at 17:33, 24 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Admiral Beatty Hotel; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: QPQ waived. AGF on source supporting hook. My only issue might be with the use of the word "reestablished" in the hook and article. Does the source use this word? It seems like "converted into" might be more appropriate. Ergo Sum 16:47, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Good to go now. Ergo Sum 18:28, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good work!
Categories:
- C-Class Architecture articles
- Unknown-importance Architecture articles
- C-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- C-Class New Brunswick articles
- Low-importance New Brunswick articles
- WikiProject New Brunswick articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- C-Class Tourism articles
- Unknown-importance Tourism articles
- C-Class Hotels articles
- Unknown-importance Hotels articles
- WikiProject Hotels articles
- WikiProject Travel and Tourism articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles