Talk:Action of 29 November 1811

Military history: Maritime / British / European / French / Napoleonic era

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Croatia Low‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Action of 29 November 1811 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Action of 29 November 1811 is part of the Adriatic campaign of 1807–1814 series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 30, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
September 24, 2008	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Article preparation

In case anyone stumbles across this, I will be writing a full version of this article in my userspace and uploading it here once it is ready to compliment my work on Battle of Lissa (1811) an associated action.--Jackyd101 (talk) 16:52, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is now uploaded here.--Jackyd101 (talk) 11:12, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from [[{{subst:Action of 29 November 1811}}]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Greetings!

Some things I'd like to discuss before I pass the article -

The action of November 1811 was the result of the British interception of a French reinforcement convoy traveling from Corfu to Trieste with a consignment of cannon, and resulted in a crushing British victory, only one French ship escaping capture by the undermanned British force. - When I first read the introduction, this sprung to mind as 'point of view', because it gives inferiority to the British forces to heighten the sense of their victory; this, against a group of French merchants. Perhaps the sentence can be reworded without the words crushing and undermanned. The fact that it was undermanned can be read in the article, and crushing seems parallel to words like slaughter, etc.

I perfectly take your point and will remove both adjectives. I should point out though that none of the vessels engaged were merchants. All the French ships were fully-armed military vessels that happened to be transporting a load of cannon between two French military bases.

Is there anyway to integrate the key into the actual tables? I think this would look nicer, although this really won't affect the review; just a suggestion - it's also sligtly related to list incorporation MoS rules, although not covered.

I will move it and see if it works.

With these changes, the first one in particular, this article should pass the review easily. JonCatalan (talk) 13:03, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou very much, I will take care of these immediately.--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:06, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, it looks better (avoiding the word much, since it was already good!) and this is without a doubt GA material. JonCatalan (talk) 18:10, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]