Jump to content

Talk:Action game

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What is this game?

[edit]

I can't think of a single game that fits that exactly description, let alone an entire genre. What game is this page referring to? I think of action games as being a catch-all term for a number of genres that feature action, including FPS, some driving games (Burnout series), maaaaaybe fighting games like Soul Calibur and basically any game with fast-paced violence. Weefz 00:34, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You have a good point. There really isn't any good definition of an Action game. Unlike movies, where the movie is classified by it's subject matter (e.g. War movie, historical, scifi -- an exception would be the documentory), games are more logically classified by their style of gameplay (RTS, FPS, Racing, etc). An FPS would be an FPS if it was in space, WWII, or in an old man's mind. Thus, as every game involves "actions", the term "Action game" is incurably vague and should be avoided. Unfortunately, this term was originally invented to describe the games that do not fit into other categories, but now seems to be applied to virtual every game other than chess. michaelb 23:43, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Action is more of a sub-genre of video games, than its own genre. The only time that it isn't used as a sub is when you talk about games on the Internet, then it is its own genre. Gamerman 10:09, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
um, yes, this is Action game

Should Action-Adventure Games be Considered a Subgenre of Action Games?

[edit]

It seems to me that the very definition of action games goes against this article's classification of action-adventure games being a subgenre. Let's look at the criteria and use Resident Evil 4 (see action-adventure games page to validate it being of that genre) as a template.

  • Lack of a "Save Game" feature. (see Save game)Has a save game feature (you use typewriters)
  • Lack of involving or complex puzzles. This is true for the most part though I did get stuck for a bit on one.
  • In-Depth Plot or Story Elements are absent from many action games and takes a minor role in most. The story, however cheesy it may be, is very much there and very much part of the reason for playing the game.
  • Lack of Character Interaction or involvement with choices that affect your character personally. The in-game cinemas do address your character personally.
  • Many times the player controls a single character or switches back and forth between a few different characters while playing. Come on! This is a criterion for any game!
  • Most Action Games focus on manipulation of superficial elements such as where an object is located on the screen or how it moves. What the heck does this mean?
  • Lack of turn-based elements. Ok! I'll admit that it isn't turnbased.

As you can see, most of the criteria don't fit Resident Evil 4, a well known action-adventure game and as such I'd like to see this article stating that rather the opposite is true. I believe that there is a passage from the adventure game genre article that admits to the perception of adventure games as being a subgenre of action-adventure games. While they decry that argument, arguing toward adventure games being connected to Computer RPG's, the idea that action and adventure games are a subgenre of action-adventure games does exist.

Redefinition Please

[edit]

The "Action Game" genre is not a genre at all. It is more of a loose description. As no-one can come up with a good set of criteria for an action game, it is subsequently difficult to classify any game under it, and we lose the entire genre aspect. This is opposed to the adventure genre, which while having a rather vague title, has a number of games that all follow similar lines and fill criteria. It was also kick-started by the game "Adventure", which helped define it. I do propose that we dissolve this page, but rather state that labeling a game as an "Action Game" is more of a buzz-word then a definition.

Agreed. I think the origin of the term was waaaay back when it could be used to describe simplistic shoot-em-ups, platformers and adventures, I seem to remember this term being bandied around a lot in my ZX Spectrum magazines. The listing of sub-genres also looks totally out of whack, mainly since they all could have been described as action games once upon a time, but have now become genres of their own. I'd wholeheartedly support the change or removal of the so-called sub genres and the rewording of this article pointing out that the term is now out of date. QuagmireDog 10:25, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some sites to use as references

[edit]

I'm looking through some Top-priority articles that happen to be Start-class, and this was the first Top article on the alphabetical list. So I'm going to provide some sites to use as references for experts on the subject to improve this article to above a pitiful Start-class.

Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 13:07, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The image File:Warsow-03.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:27, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Upon stumbling across a sentence stating, essentially, how 3D action games in general suffer issues in control difficulty severe enough to negatively affect their market viability in relation to 2D action games, I had a chuckle. Turns out this obviously incorrect/outdated info is taken from a rather ancient article, and so I removed it, along with the accompanying image (seeing how it didn't really relate to the text in any kind of purposeful manner). Encoctmebreux (talk) 17:01, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2006 is ancient is it? bridies (talk) 17:20, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Considering context, I'd say it's old enough to be considered outdated. As to whether or not it's old enough to warrant the use of [[1]], it's debatable. But then again, you were just mindlessly nitpicking, weren't you?:) Encoctmebreux (talk) 18:43, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. :P bridies (talk) 18:46, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stealth Action should be a subcatagory of Shooter

[edit]

90% of the stealth games out there are basically shooters with heavy stealth elements. Nearly all of the MGS games can be finished without really making full use of the stealth elements and playing the game as a shooter, for example. Its not the ideal way, but it is possible. So I propose that Stealth be moved under the shooter subcatagory rather than under the generic action catagory. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.209.209.129 (talk) 18:37, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stealth games often allow shooting, but the stealth mechanic has little to do with the shooting mechanic; a stealth game doesn't need to include shooting mechanics. Take Mark of the Ninja, for instance. Even the early scene in The Ocarina of Time where you sneak into the castle without being seen could count as a short stealth game. Stealth is a tough mechanic to make work well, but it is a mechanic that can stand on its own. However, you can't have a FPS or a TPS without the game also being a shooter.
...Though shooters fall under "action games" just as much as stealth games do, if not even more. The word "stealth" isn't even used in this article. I'm not really sure what you want changed... Maplestrip (talk) 12:37, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Action game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:00, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Action game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:55, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Action game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Action_game&oldid=1263689176"