Talk:Acherontiscus

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Acherontiscus article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	Acherontiscus is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Acherontiscus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100215182654/http://palaeontology.palass-pubs.org/pdf/Vol%2012/Pages%20537-548.pdf to http://palaeontology.palass-pubs.org/pdf/Vol%2012/Pages%20537-548.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:48, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Prefrontals and nostrils

In the adelospondyls-as-colosteids section, the text said: "Marjanović (2010) claimed that the prefrontal not only contacted the orbits, but also the nares (nostrils), a colosteid characteristic which has been found in adelospondyls by some studies[ref] but not by others.[ref]" As I have since learned, that is not in fact known in any colosteids: none of them has an undamaged nose. This was first pointed out by Lombard & Bolt (2010, description of Deltaherpeton) and is discussed further in one of the first few characters in Appendix S1 of my 2019 paper with Michel Laurin.

I have not checked the rest of the article for outdated bits of information, because unfortunately I don't have time. Just make sure the redescription of the skull (2019) is taken into account. David Marjanović (talk) 15:26, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will be updating the page in the future and I appreciate any help given. Just make sure to be careful of Wikipedia's original research rules since you're one of the authors being cited. Fanboyphilosopher (talk) 22:52, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]