Talk:Acelhuate River/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: PizzaKing13 (talk · contribs) 08:26, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 02:23, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Just a few minor copy changes and a question. This article is almost there. Get some fresh eyes after this sitting review; ping me when addressed. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

@Sammi Brie: Should be addressed PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 03:28, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Did you know? If you fancy doing so, I always have plenty of GA nominees to review. Just look for the all-uppercase titles in the Television section. Reviews always appreciated.

Copy changes

• I notice your style is to include side-by-sides of Spanish quotes with their English translations. I am not sure that is necessary at every instance, e.g. the William Soriano quote.

• MOS:FOREIGNQUOTE
  • I mostly meant having the translation there; having the English there of course makes sense. I suppose it's a writer's option to include the original or not, though, so I won't quibble. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 04:26, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

• the United States Army Corps of Engineers described the river's waters as "severely contaminated" and a "biohazard", and recommended that contact with the river water "should be avoided" Remove comma (WP:CINS)

• Removed

• introduced a plan to decontaminated extra "D" at the end

• Fixed

Sourcing and spot checks

Reviewed: 2, 5, 7, 16

No issues.

Images

All images are appropriately licensed. Encouragement: Add alt text to images for accessibility purposes.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.