Talk:Accountability partner

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 September 2022. The result of the discussion was keep.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Evangelical Christianity Low‑importance

	Evangelical Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Evangelical Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Evangelical Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Evangelical ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject Evangelical ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject Evangelical ChristianityEvangelical Christianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Accountability partner appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 October 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that some evangelical Christians confess their sexual temptations to an accountability partner to maintain their sexual purity?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Accountability partner.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 19:29, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that some evangelical Christians confess their sexual temptations to an accountability partner in order to avoid committing sin? Source: Diefendorf, Sarah (2015). "After the Wedding Night: Sexual Abstinence and Masculinities over the Life Course". Gender & Society. 29 (5): 647-669. doi:10.1177/0891243215591597.; Bartkowski, John P. (2000). "Breaking Walls, Raising Fences: Masculinity, Intimacy, and Accountability among the Promise Keepers". Sociology of Religion. 61 (1): 33–53. doi:10.2307/3712089. ISSN 1069-4404.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Regensburg Botanical Society
- Comment: This is my fifth DYK nomination, so I think I am exempt from QPQ (though I will try to do one anyway if I can). I saved this from AfD; expansion began on 27 September with this edit by Ficaia; before that, this was the state of the article pre-expansion.

5x expanded by WJ94 (talk). Self-nominated at 12:20, 4 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

@WJ94: Actually, as this is your fifth nomination, you are required to do a QPQ. From WP:DYK: If you have previously nominated fewer than five articles (whether self-nominated or otherwise), no QPQ is required. The QPQ requirement kicks in starting with your fifth nomination. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 14:27, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Narutolovehinata5: Thanks for your reply. It does seem from the wording you quoted that I would be exempt from QPQ: when I made this nomination, I had previously nominated fewer than five articles (i.e., 4). I will try to do a review in the next couple of days nonetheless. WJ94 (talk) 09:20, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have now reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Regensburg Botanical Society. WJ94 (talk) 15:07, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New enough, long enough, neutral in wikivoice and I could not detect any too-close paraphrasing. Accessed the source through the Wikipedia Library, hook fact mostly checks out, but the Wikipedia article does not mention "sin" by name—only by allusion through the sexual purity stuff. Once changed, I can approve @WJ94:. DigitalIceAge (talk) 17:23, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DigitalIceAge: Thanks for your review. How about the following alternative hook?

ALT1: ... that some evangelical Christians confess their sexual temptations to an accountability partner in order to maintain their sexual purity?

WJ94 (talk) 14:57, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Better. Approve ALT1. DigitalIceAge (talk) 17:14, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]