Talk:Accession Day tilt

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Accession Day tilt article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

English Royalty Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Royalty. For more information, visit the project page.English RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject English RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject English RoyaltyEnglish royalty
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Accession Day tilt appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 December 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Accession Day tilts were jousts held at the court of Queen Elizabeth I in which her courtiers appeared in elaborate allegorical disguises (pictured)?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/December.

Wikipedia

DYK nom

I've put a joint DYK nom in for this; over 1800 chars and growing by my count. - PKM (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Faery Queen

The Faery Queen redirects to The Fairy-Queen, Purcell's Opera. And have we conflated Sidney and Spenser? Spenser poem is The Faerie Queene. No time to disentangle & expand right now, help? - PKM (talk) 03:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll fix my tangle. --Wetman (talk) 03:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks great. I flew by in such a hurry I wasn't sure which edit this was part of... - PKM (talk) 20:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Accession Day tilt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:09, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]