Talk:Acceleration (law)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Acceleration (law) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Remove Template as to citations

The template is removed because the citations given are of high quality, and are indisputable. Adding additional citations will only result in a needless and inappropriate number of citations, which are mere duplicates. USN007 (talk) 06:09, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~I would agree for the reasons given by USN007. The citations tag is inappropriate in the context in which it was used. 71.91.178.54 (talk) 06:10, 24 October 2018 (UTC)~~[reply]

Striking sock agreeing with themself. DMacks (talk) 00:46, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring template as the user who removed it has been banned for socking and pressing a viewpoint in contravention of WP:NPOV. 2001:8003:591D:2400:E199:C5C6:66BF:6035 (talk) 06:50, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Worldwide view

I don't think the worldwide view policy can really apply to this sort of article- as from what I've been able to find, the law field dosen't seem to make mention of the term "acceleration" anywhere outside the U.S. - and therefore, much like the coverage of a U.S. supreme court decision, is intrinsically bent on the use as accepted in the Untied States. I would therefore find the use of the template to be inappropriate in this setting. I'll give a chance for others to state their opinions on this, before I go ahead and remove. USN007 (talk) 06:15, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The concept of "constructive acceleration" seems to have a US legal connection, but is also discussed in connection with other nations (possibly as a spread of the US model, or looking for support of the concept from common-law or other existing legal frameworks). I don't know much about contract law, so I don't know the specific meaning in the US. And all I know for other places is what I can google. Maybe not so much "globalize" for the existing two meanings, as "there is another meaning missing, and that one is not as strictly US". DMacks (talk) 06:46, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]