Talk:Academic Free License

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Infobox

Can someone please expand the infobox? I don't have enough understanding of Debian or Copyleft to say whether the Academic Free License would qualify as yes or no for those. Thanks. --The Wild Falcon 13:31, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I found out it's not copyleft. No idea whether it's Debian-approved, though. --The Wild Falcon 13:56, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Broken reference links

The full text of versions 1.2 and 2.1 do not appear to be on the OSI site as the used to be. I do not know if this is temporary or intentional. --Jimbojw 04:31, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The opensource-definition.org seems to have been domain-squatted, so the links to the license text are all broken. --amk (talk) 15:06, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]