Jump to content

Talk:Three Cocks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Aberllynfi)

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 13:19, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]



AberllynfiThree Cocks – Widely accepted English name for the village. Per WP:NCGN. Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 11:08, 30 July 2014 (UTC) Lewis Hulbert (talk) 12:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The name is used on UK gov sites and Ordnance Survey maps (where the data is taken from) + local businesses[1]. Not a source, but it's even on the road sign at 52.0338, -3.2047. There's not going to be many sources for a small Welsh village, but it's definitely the official English name. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 00:08, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand much about Google Books but the results seem to primarily be about the use of three cocks in Heraldry. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 01:14, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Which per WP:CAPS doesn't count, right I see the railway station was also known by the English name before it closed, then Support. Thanks. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:04, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Post-RM comments

[edit]

Comment: It seems the names Aberllynfi and Three Cocks hav equal standing and are both the official names. Roadsigns show Aberllynfi first, and Three Cocks second. Both names are also used by local businesses. I think re-naming the article Three Cocks is unneeded and will lead to it being vandalized. ~Asarlaí 14:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Having both names on a sign doesn't mean they're both in equal standing, all road signs in Wales have both the English and Welsh names on the sign. Signs for Cardiff have both Cardiff and the native Caerdydd, yet there'd be absolutely no chance of anybody claiming that the names are in equal standing for use on the English Wikipedia. Three Cocks has redirected to this article for a long time and it's received no vandalism, so I see no way that it would increase. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 20:34, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
But the official 'welcome' signs for the nearest village show only the English name Glasbury, while the signs for this village show both: Aberllynfi first and Three Cocks second.
Also, the Ordnance Survey map shows Three Cocks/Aberllynfi for this village, but for surrounding villages only one name is given (Glasbury, Bronllys, etc). You can see the Ordnance Survey map here.
This would seem to indicate that both names are used and hav equal standing in English (unlike Caerdydd). The article name should really be something like 'Aberllynfi/Three Cocks'. ~Asarlaí 14:22, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ordnance Survey Maps shows Glasbury/Y Clas-ar-Wy (only if you zoom in closely) and only shows Bronllys alone because there's no English name for the village, so all that seems irrelevant to the naming of Three Cocks. I don't understand your "(unlike Caerdydd)" comment since Ordnance Survey also shows Cardiff/Caerdydd.
Since I don't think either of us are going to agree on this I'm going to leave a message on the talk page for WikiProject Wales so somebody experienced with this sort of thing can give their input. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:41, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
My point is that the OS map shows Three Cocks/Aberllynfi at all levels, but for other villages it only shows alternativ names if you zoom in closely. Understandably it's different for big towns/cities like Cardiff. Getting more input seems a good idea. ~Asarlaí 17:06, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Three Cocks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:34, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]