Talk:Abelisaurus

A fact from Abelisaurus appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 October 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Abelisaurus had a lighter skull than other dinosaurs due to large fenestrations behind its eyes?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2005/October.

Wikipedia

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Duh

Is it really necessary to say that Abelisaurus is an abelisaurid dinosaur, because given the name "Abelisaurus" I'd say it's fairly obvious to even the most uninformed reader. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.36.148.242 (talk) 00:57, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not all readers will know that Abelisaurids exist, let alone that Abelisaurus is the namesake of the group. MMartyniuk (talk) 12:25, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing Dinoworld

In this documentary, the head of the abelisaur is feathered. There are some other jarring errors in this so-called 'accurate' sci-doc, but that one stood out to me. Should the higher level article reflect that ceratosauria are not thought to have developed feathers? 50.111.33.78 (talk) 18:49, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we don't know, and no reliable sources cover this, so we can't do anything. FunkMonk (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Athhhhhóooooooóoooooóooo

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATHOS! 177.126.46.255 (talk) 17:38, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]