Jump to content

Talk:Abd al-Ilah

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Arabic spelling

[edit]

Was this guy's name really spelled عبد الإله instead of عبد الله ?? AnonMoos 03:10, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The name was عبدالله , the servant of Allah, عبد means servant, and الله is "Allah". Allah is actually al-ilah. "al" means "the", and "ilah" or "ilaha" means "god". So "al-ilaha" means "the One and Only God". With use the "i" or "alif" in Arabic was dropped, and "al-ilah" became "Allah". Hence the alternative way of spelling "Abd_ullah" would have been acceptable if instead of Allah we were using al-ilaha.
--peacedove 10:54, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No sir

[edit]

No, Abdullah is عبدللہ. Mustaqbal 09:55, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. The definite article always loses its vowel when in the middle of a sentence and followed by a word ending in a vowel, but the written 'alif letter remains. In بسم الله , the 'alif of ism disappears (very unusually), but the 'alif of Allah remains (as always)... AnonMoos (talk) 16:49, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
His name was definitely was spelled عبد الإله - if you google search him you'll see that's how he always comes up. Just an unusual name. Mccapra (talk) 17:09, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mixed Up?

[edit]

I feel the "Notes" section should become the "References" section. Then rename the "Notes" to "Bibliography" section for the books sourced and references. Adamdaley (talk) 11:05, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay to put the citations under a "Notes" heading and the books utilised under "References" (or "Bibliography"). The two main things I think are that Churchill is listed under References and appears not to be cited and therefore should be under a "Further reading" heading until or unless it is cited, plus the "External references" appear to be the sources cited under Notes, and should be transferred there. I can take care of that... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 11:43, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abhallah.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Abhallah.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:06, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Homosexuality

[edit]

In his book Closet Queens, about gay 20th century British politicians, historian and biographer Michael Bloch mentions Abd al-Ilah (whom he calls Prince Abdulilah) on pages 157 as being homosexual and a close friend of Alan Lennox-Boyd, 1st Viscount Boyd of Merton. Bloch says after al_Ilah was killed, "the revolutionaries discovered intimate letters from Lennox-Boyd among the Prince's papers, which they released to the world's press." Unfortunately he doesn't give any more details and having looked online I can't find any reference of those letters, which would surely be notorious. On page 159, Bloch says that Lennox-Boyd and Henry Channon organised a memorial service for their friend, the Prince, in 1958.

Bloch, Michael (2015). Closet Queens. Little, Brown. ISBN 1408704129 - 89.36.70.96 (talk) 09:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok add it. He was a marmite miner yeah but at least it is sourced. Ezz upp (talk) 09:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Thanks. No need to be disrespectful, though. 89.36.70.96 (talk) 09:54, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]